Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: which one to use?

Budimir, Ivan and Stojsavljević, Sanja and Baršić, Neven and Bišćanin, Alen and Mirošević, Gorana and Bohnec, Sven and Kirigin, Lora Stanka and Pavić, Tajana (2017) Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: which one to use? World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23 (41). pp. 7450-7458. ISSN 1007-9327

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (1MB)

Abstract

AIM: To compare the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall score (RS) and Baylor bleeding score (BBS) in predicting clinical outcomes and need for interventions in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2013, 1012 consecutive patients admitted with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) were prospectively followed. The pre-endoscopic RS, BBS and GBS, as well as the post-endoscopic diagnostic scores (RS and BBS) were calculated for all patients according to their urgent upper endoscopy findings. Area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUROC) curves were calculated for the prediction of lethal outcome, rebleeding, needs for blood transfusion and/or surgical intervention, and the optimal cutoff values were evaluated. RESULTS: PUB accounted for 41.9% of all upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, 5.2% patients died and 5.4% patients underwent surgery. By comparing the AUROC curves of the aforementioned pre-endoscopic scores, the RS best predicted lethal outcome (AUROC 0.82 vs 0.67 vs 0.63, respectively), but the GBS best predicted need for hospital-based intervention or 30-d mortality (AUROC 0.84 vs 0.57 vs 0.64), rebleeding (AUROC 0.75 vs 0.61 vs 0.53), need for blood transfusion (AUROC 0.83 vs 0.63 vs 0.58) and surgical intervention (0.82 vs 0.63 vs 0.52) The post-endoscopic RS was also better than the post-endoscopic BBS in predicting lethal outcome (AUROC 0.82 vs 0.69, respectively). CONCLUSION: The RS is the best predictor of mortality and the GBS is the best predictor of rebleeding, need for blood transfusion and/or surgical intervention in patients with PUB. There is no one 'perfect score' and we suggest that these two tests be used concomitantly.

Item Type: Article
MeSH: Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data ; Croatia/epidemiology ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peptic Ulcer/complications ; Peptic Ulcer/diagnosis ; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/diagnosis ; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/mortality ; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/therapy ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Risk Assessment/methods ; Severity of Illness Index ; Young Adult
Departments: Katedra za internu medicinu
Depositing User: Anja Majstorović
Status: Published
Creators:
CreatorsEmail
Budimir, IvanUNSPECIFIED
Stojsavljević, SanjaUNSPECIFIED
Baršić, NevenUNSPECIFIED
Bišćanin, AlenUNSPECIFIED
Mirošević, GoranaUNSPECIFIED
Bohnec, SvenUNSPECIFIED
Kirigin, Lora StankaUNSPECIFIED
Pavić, TajanaUNSPECIFIED
Date: 7 November 2017
Date Deposited: 28 May 2019 08:10
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2020 08:48
Subjects: /
Related URLs:
URI: http://medlib.mef.hr/id/eprint/3241

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year